Re: using whole message in reply

1999-08-02 Thread Starfire Farm, LLC
This message is from: "Starfire Farm, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike May wrote: > This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At 04:02 PM 8/1/99 -0400, you wrote: > > >(Joel, just because I agree with you doesn't mean we are going to be > >exchanging spit in the shower). : ) > > B

Re: using whole message in reply

1999-08-02 Thread Mike May
This message is from: Mike May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 04:02 PM 8/1/99 -0400, you wrote: (Joel, just because I agree with you doesn't mean we are going to be exchanging spit in the shower). : ) Boy now this conjures up some vivid images in ones mind! ;-)

using whole message in reply

1999-08-01 Thread bcjdvm
This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even though Joel may be the only one brave or brash enough to constantly harp about it, many of us appreciate when people include little or none of the message they were replying to. It just saves time and scrolling for us, and usually, including the origin