Re: [Flac] FLAC: minimum system requirements

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if the minimum system requirements are determined for > the FLAC decoder? > I ask this because I have some old computers and also a "older" > Pocket PC, > so I was wondering how many MB RAM and Mhz CPU speed is needed to be > able

Re: [Flac] FLAC: command line output

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
this is a problem with the command window settings; the file name is longer than the 'screen'. you can change the properties of the command window so this doesn't happen. Josh --- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the FLAC command line tool to encode my WAV files in som

Re: [Flac] Efficiency

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Christopher Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list users, > > Is there a comparison somewhere of the efficiency of decoding flac > files, with respect to some benchmark related to cpu processing? As > compared to, say, ape files? I ask because I have recently switched > my > entire arch

Re: [Flac] Room for safe opaque blocks in flac streams? Looking to add error correction to flac.

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there an obvious safe way to add some extra data to a flac file > that spec decoders will happily ignore? > > I'd like to explore creating a tool which will add N extra redundancy > frames at the end which will allow perfect decoding with up to

Re: [Flac] FLAC: decoding to WAV in the future

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I see. thanks for the answer > Is it still possible to decode FLAC files, encoded with the very > first FLAC > encoder, with FLAC 1.1.4? If the answer is true (I have never tested > it), then I'm pretty sure the future will bring no surprises. yep, F

Re: [Flac] FLAC: 99% complete message?

2007-04-08 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to encode a WAV file to FLAC. But then I get a strange > message: 99% > complete. You can see the details below: > > > 12 - In My Eyes (Radio Edit).wav: 99% complete, ratio=0,67412 - In My > Eyes > (Radi > o Edit).wav: WARNING: skipping

Re: [Flac] FLAC: minimum system requirements

2007-04-08 Thread Mark Rudholm
Harry Sack wrote: Hi, I was wondering if the minimum system requirements are determined for the FLAC decoder? I ask this because I have some old computers and also a "older" Pocket PC, so I was wondering how many MB RAM and Mhz CPU speed is needed to be able to decode FLAC files without any pr

[Flac] FLAC: minimum system requirements

2007-04-08 Thread Harry Sack
Hi, I was wondering if the minimum system requirements are determined for the FLAC decoder? I ask this because I have some old computers and also a "older" Pocket PC, so I was wondering how many MB RAM and Mhz CPU speed is needed to be able to decode FLAC files without any problems. thx