On Wednesday 11 July 2007 8:53:43 pm you wrote:
> FLAC is lossless. That's what the L stands for. Whatever encoding
> options you use, you'll get the same quality.
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 19:46 -0400, Rick wrote:
> > what would be the best string setting for ripping in flac?
> > only looking for
FLAC is lossless. That's what the L stands for. Whatever encoding
options you use, you'll get the same quality.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 19:46 -0400, Rick wrote:
> what would be the best string setting for ripping in flac?
> only looking for highest audiophile quality possible.
>
> Thanks -
> Richar
what would be the best string setting for ripping in flac?
only looking for highest audiophile quality possible.
Thanks -
Richard
___
Flac mailing list
Flac@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
Maybe a little bit. Tag contents, for example, aren't compressed (and
rightly so).
But it's not going to make any serious impact on the audio data, in fact
it's quite likely to end up bigger. (See the Pigeonhole Principle! [1])
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle
On Wed, 2007-
Hi,
I was wondering if it's possible to compress encoded FLAC files even more
using a traditional compression algorithm like zip, rar, ... or won't you
get any smaller files using such an algorithm by applying it on the encoded
FLAC files?
thx
___
Flac
