Re: [flac] md5 checksum

2007-10-19 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/10/19, Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > --- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi > > > > > > here some questions about the md5 checksum: > > > > > > - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is > > > different > > >

Re: [flac] md5 checksum

2007-10-19 Thread Harry Sack
2007/10/19, Josh Coalson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > --- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi > > > > here some questions about the md5 checksum: > > > > - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is > > different > > of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Wi

Re: [flac] md5 checksum

2007-10-18 Thread Josh Coalson
--- Harry Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > here some questions about the md5 checksum: > > - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is > different > of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will > playing/decoding still be possible (with some error frame

[flac] md5 checksum

2007-10-18 Thread Harry Sack
hi here some questions about the md5 checksum: - what happens when the md5 checksum of the decoded audio is different of the internally stored checksum due to file corruption ? Will playing/decoding still be possible (with some error frames) or will playing /decoding be not possible at all (so al