Op 07-02-12 19:50, Ralph Giles schreef:
> Basically the audio is chopped into a blocks and each block is coded
> either uncompressed, as a constant value (good for silence), or with
> linear predictive coding plus a rice-coded residual. I don't know how
> the encoder decides where to put the block
On 02/07/12 02:08 pm, JonY wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 03:33, Dave Yeo wrote:
>> On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>>> Dave Yeo wrote:
>>>
This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testi
JonY wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 03:33, Dave Yeo wrote:
> > On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> >> Dave Yeo wrote:
> >>
> >>> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
> >>> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing
> >>> and tha
On 2/8/2012 03:33, Dave Yeo wrote:
> On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> Dave Yeo wrote:
>>
>>> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
>>> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing
>>> and that klibc contains so many im
On 02/07/12 12:03 am, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Dave Yeo wrote:
>
>> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
>> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing
>> and that klibc contains so many improvements I think this is exceptable.
>
On 7 February 2012 06:24, Manu Ghulyani wrote:
> I am unable to find the mathematical details of the codec , please guide.
Unfortunately I'm not aware of a clear write-up of how the FLAC format
works in detail. One must muddle through between
http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html and the sourc
I am unable to find the mathematical details of the codec , please guide.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manu Ghulyani
B.E.(Hons.) Electronics & Instrumentation.
B.I.T.S. Pilani.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo
At 16:26 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>On 06.02.2012 18:52, Olav Sunde wrote:
>> At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>>
>>> Olav,
>>>
>>> A change like this could easily break the format. That would be
>>> a bad choice.
>>
>> That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>>
>>
>>> On the othe
Dave Yeo wrote:
> This commit will break OS/2's EMX 0.9d library (GCC 2.8.1) which has been
> been replaced by klibc. Considering the age of EMX and lack of testing
> and that klibc contains so many improvements I think this is exceptable.
Sorry Dave, I can't do that. Or rather sorry, the patch d
