the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn here
are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from flac.
the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll just send it to
depositfiles.
http://depositfiles.com/files/90anghniw
On 15-04-13 17:54, Marcus Johnson wrote:
the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn
here are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from
flac.
the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll just send it to
depositfiles.
As far as I can
On 4/15/2013 6:03 PM, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
On 15-04-13 17:54, Marcus Johnson wrote:
the audio was also 192,000khz sample rate, forgot to mention that, adn
here are the audio files, the original, the flac, and the decoded from
flac.
the archive is 7zip, Idk where to upload it so I'll
Also, FFmpeg encodes the audio to only 3/4th the size, that's kinda strange.
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
That's because FFmpeg is based on flake instead of FLAC. It seems FFmpeg
outperforms FLAC here by quite a large margin, usually the differences
aren't very large at all.
On 15-04-13 18:47, Marcus Johnson wrote:
Also, FFmpeg encodes the audio to only 3/4th the size, that's kinda
strange.
Okay, I was thinking it may have been something to do with the header, but
I wasn't sure how to verify that. thanks guys.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:00 PM, flac-dev-requ...@xiph.org wrote:
Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to
flac-dev@xiph.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
