, so
far I only use a simple text editor and I want to keep it that way for
a while, if possible.
I found a similar thread by searching, but the answer was somewhat
confusing to me, sorry for being an idiot.
Thanks
Johnny Rosenberg
___
flac-dev mailing
so if you just read and then write, you end up with a
slightly lower volume (not that you can hear any difference if you do
it only a few times, but still, it isn't right, AND it is very easy to
do it right, so why don't they?)…
Johnny Rosenberg, the beginner
&g
2013/2/9 Erik de Castro Lopo :
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> For example, when loading an audiofile with libsndfile, all the
>> samples are converted to floating point numbers,
>
> With libsndfile, converting to float is optional. You can just as
> easily read int or
vailable in the buffer. That's why I need to read the
whole file into an array.
Maybe I should just do something else, I'm probably too stupid for
these things anyway. Or too old. Or both.
Thanks for listening, you don't need to reply to this crap, sorry.
Kind regards
2013/2/10 Erik de Castro Lopo :
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> Anyway, if I'm allowed to ask a libsndfile question here,
>
> Sorry, but no, this list is for FLAC related discussion.
And of course you won't waste your time replying outside this mailing list?
Is there a
2013/2/10 Erik de Castro Lopo :
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> For instance the write_callback thing:
>> client_data – can it be a pointer to just about anything?
>
> I assume you mean:
>
> https://www.xiph.org/flac/api/group__flac__stream__decoder.html#g
2013/2/10 Erik de Castro Lopo :
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> And of course you won't waste your time replying outside this mailing list?
>> Is there a libsndfile mailing list?
>> Hm… yet another stupid question, of course. If there is, you wouldn't
>
I don't know how it happened, but I accidently sent the message below
privately and not to the list. Maybe a result of my built in
stupidity.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Johnny Rosenberg
Date: 2013/3/3
Subject: Re: [flac-dev] flac 1.3.0pre1 prelease
To: Cristian Rodr
What is the reason that libFLAC is available for Windows in the first
place? Aren't there lots of alternatives for Windows anyway?
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
Ooops, I accidently replied privately, sorry for that. Here's to the
list (the corrected version, since I accidently omitted a word in my
original reply):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Johnny Rosenberg
Date: 2013/3/16
Subject: Re: [flac-dev] (no subject)
To: Marcus Jo
Ooops… I accidently sent a reply privately instead of to the list,
sorry for that.
Here it is again, this time hopefully to the list:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Johnny Rosenberg
Date: 2013/4/23
Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Metaflac UTF-8 fixes
To: Janne Hyvärinen
2013/4/23 Janne
2013/4/23 Ulrich Klauer :
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> but I have used metaflac for
>> years (in my own bash-scripts) and never had any problems with UTF-8
>> (I never use anything but UTF-8) what so ever. What exactly am I
>> missing here?
>
> As you men
Den fre 9 juni 2023 kl 17:28 skrev Martijn van Beurden :
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to release FLAC 1.4.3 on Friday the 23th of this month. That
> makes 23-06-23, so there's no confusing the year with the date of the
> month.
>
>
Or just use the international standard format (ISO-8601): 2023-06-23. No
13 matches
Mail list logo
