should not take place here IMHO.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
>Best regards
>Riggs
>___
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac-dev@xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
___
flac-dev mail
I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and Janne
Hyvärinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to me if I
can not find binaries at the official site.
Olav Sunde
At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyvärinen wrote:
>On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik d
le), so it would probably be a bit early to update this in the FLAC
>source.
>
>op 16-06-14 10:15, Olav Sunde schreef:
>>I mention metaflac because there are a few shell scripts that use it to write
>>RG tags in a flac music library on Linux. With support for Ebu R128 gai
8.
I store music files on a Linux NAS and would like to perform calculations on
the same box. With foobar2000 (or JRiver win) I'd have to do this across a
Samba mount which is slow(ish)
At 00:19 16.06.2014, you wrote:
>Olav Sunde wrote:
>
>> has anyone looked at adding R128gain
flac so we can select to use
>this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain?
>
>If this message turns up twice I apologize. I may have used the wrong subject
>tag
>
>Regards
>Olav Sunde
>___
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac
Hi
has anyone looked at adding R128gain code to metaflac so we can select to use
this calculation for RP tags rather than replay gain?
Best regards
___
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
At 09:06 26.06.2013, you wrote:
>Olav Sunde wrote:
>
>> I just followed the redirect Ralph Giles posted about above. That works
>> as expected, but on https://xiph.org/flac/download.html the Windows
>> link point to this page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/fl
, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>Olav Sunde wrote:
>
>> under download, most links still point to Sourceforge with 1.2.1 as newest
>
>Where?
>
>On this page:
>
>https://xiph.org/flac/download.html
>
>there are links to OS specific builds of FLAC on sourceforge,
Hi,
under download, most links still point to Sourceforge with 1.2.1 as newest
At 07:36 26.06.2013, Ralph Giles wrote:
>All,
>
>At Erik's request I made flac.sourceforge.net just redirect to
>xiph.org/flac/ This will simplify keeping things up to date, since I
>never got the sf.net version upda
>
>In the changelog I see up to 192 kHz ReplayGain support mentioned for
>flac.exe, but not for metaflac. Was it changed in one and not the other??
I really do not know. The discussion on metaflac and support for replay gain
for higher sample rates was back in February/March 2012
The changelog mentions 192kHz support for replay gain in metaflac, but metaflac
--help has the old description for --add-replay-gain with 48kHz max bit rate.
I also thought that the old restriction, where files processed had to have the
same bit rate, was removed?
Olav Sunde
binaries available for download. Most
links under download still point to 1.2.1 at Sourceforge.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
At 09:56 10.06.2013, you wrote:
>Dear Free Audio Tool Lovers,
>
>I am very pleased to announce the first official release of FLAC, the Free
>Lossless Audio Code
At 10:30 10.02.2012, you wrote:
I'd go for Earl Chew's solution as this corrects a possible calculation error,
plus it will also handle 192 kHz. Ideally replay gain sample rate analysis
should follow sample rate capability of flac itself.
Olav Sunde
>Hi all,
>
>In the la
At 16:26 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>On 06.02.2012 18:52, Olav Sunde wrote:
>> At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>>
>>> Olav,
>>>
>>> A change like this could easily break the format. That would be
>>> a bad choice.
>>
>> That make
ould certainly be an improvement and hopefully become part of the command line
description so users would know how to do it.
Best regards
Olav Sunde
>Brian Willoughby
>Sound Consulting
>
>
>On Feb 6, 2012, at 03:16, Olav Sunde wrote:
>>This next is a feature request: Today it
oding
of -5 or higher, resulting in unstable playback or even reduced audio quality.
A re-encoding to -0 often solve these issues.
Can you look at a way to store parameters used for encoding in an archive so we
can check it later?
Best regards
Olav Sunde
>Olav Sunde wrote:
>
>>
;pile' of things to fix?
Thanks
Olav Sunde
>Hi all,
>
>Some time ago, I foolishly agreed to become the maintainer of FLAC,
>the Free Lossless Audio Codec. The original author and maintainer
>Josh Coalson has been MIA since early 2009.
>
>The code has been moved to the Xiph
17 matches
Mail list logo
