Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-25 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Martijn van Beurden wrote: > On 04-05-13 14:17, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > > To *1.2.1 -> libraries* I would add > > - Added support for encoding the residual coding method introduced in > > libFLAC 1.2.1 (RESIDUAL_CODING_METHOD_PARTITIONED_RICE2) which will > > encode 24-bit files more effici

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-04 Thread Martijn van Beurden
On 04-05-13 14:17, Martijn van Beurden wrote: To *1.2.1 -> libraries* I would add - Added support for encoding the residual coding method introduced in libFLAC 1.2.1 (RESIDUAL_CODING_METHOD_PARTITIONED_RICE2) which will encode 24-bit files more efficiently I meant "introduced in libFLAC 1.2.0

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-04 Thread Martijn van Beurden
On 04-05-13 12:41, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote: I don't know why this isn't on the changelog, but it is probably still a good idea to add it. This only breaks compatibility for 24-bit streams. (So: decod

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > > I don't know why this isn't on the changelog, but it is probably still a > > good idea to add it. This only breaks compatibility for 24-bit streams. > > (So: decoders older than 1.2.0 might not be

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-03 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > I don't know why this isn't on the changelog, but it is probably still a > good idea to add it. This only breaks compatibility for 24-bit streams. > (So: decoders older than 1.2.0 might not be able to decode 24-bit FLAC > fil

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.2.0 backwards-compatibility break not in changelog?

2013-05-02 Thread Martijn van Beurden
Hi all, Sorry for bringing this up this short before the release, but I noticed something rather strange. I was doing some more exotic checks on the last pre-release when I tried test_streams.sh with FLAC 1.3.0 encoding and an older version (1.1.0 or something like that) decoding. This failed