Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Dave Yeo wrote: > The Oregon State U, Open Source Lab mirror is still missing 1.3.2 downloads.xiph.org (actually ftp.osuosl.org) is more than one machine. Some of them have been updated, others haven't. Will chase it. Erik --

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Ozkan Sezer wrote: > Also, the xiph downloads page https://xiph.org/downloads/ still lists > 1.3.1 for flac download. Thats a different issue that I'm still chasing. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-03 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 1/3/17, Dave Yeo wrote: > On 01/02/17 11:43 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> Please let me know if any download.xiph.org/flac/ site is missing the >> 1.3.2 files. > > The Oregon State U, Open Source Lab mirror is still missing 1.3.2 > Dave Also, the xiph downloads page

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-03 Thread Dave Yeo
On 01/02/17 11:43 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Please let me know if any download.xiph.org/flac/ site is missing the 1.3.2 files. The Oregon State U, Open Source Lab mirror is still missing 1.3.2 Dave ___ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Declan Kelly wrote: > > The official website doesn't link to the SourceForge project, which > seems to be the only place that's hosting the 1.3.2 files. There was an issue with the osul.org mirrors but it should be fixed now. Please let me know if any download.xiph.org/flac/ site is missing

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Declan Kelly
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:23:20PM +1100, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: > > The latest version of FLAC has been releases. See: > > https://xiph.org/flac/index.html The official website doesn't link to the SourceForge project, which seems to be the only place that's hosting the 1.3.2 files.

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread lvqcl.mail
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Janne Hyvärinen wrote: That shouldn't matter. I realise that, but I wanted a better idea about how many people this is like to affect. If you were on Windows XP on some old processor this would probably not affect many people, but since you are on Windows 10 with

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Janne Hyvärinen wrote: > Attached is a patch to fix the incorrect CPU feature detection: Patched applied, but the CPU detection code remains, horrible to read, difficult to reason about, work on and maintain. This fix probably warrants a new release, but I'll hold off for a week or so to make

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Janne Hyvärinen wrote: > That shouldn't matter. I realise that, but I wanted a better idea about how many people this is like to affect. If you were on Windows XP on some old processor this would probably not affect many people, but since you are on Windows 10 with a Core i7 thats a different

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Janne Hyvärinen
On 2.1.2017 19.02, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Janne Hyvärinen wrote: Something seems to be wrong with cpu.c CPU detection code. When I compile things with MSVC all instructions except FMA is detected as missing, even though they are present in my CPU. That of course results in awful

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Janne Hyvärinen
Attached is a patch to fix the incorrect CPU feature detection: On 2.1.2017 16.39, Janne Hyvärinen wrote: Something seems to be wrong with cpu.c CPU detection code. When I compile things with MSVC all instructions except FMA is detected as missing, even though they are present in my CPU. That

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Janne Hyvärinen
Something seems to be wrong with cpu.c CPU detection code. When I compile things with MSVC all instructions except FMA is detected as missing, even though they are present in my CPU. That of course results in awful performance. ___ flac-dev mailing

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-02 Thread Declan Kelly
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:46:20PM +1100, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: > > The Xiph.org download directory and github.com/xiph/flac don't seem to have > been updated automatically as I expected. I'm chasing that. The download host is hosted by Oregon State University - is it a mirror site that's

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread Declan Kelly
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:46:20PM +1100, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: > > The Xiph.org download directory and github.com/xiph/flac don't seem to have > been updated automatically as I expected. I'm chasing that. I should have checked that the new downloads were available from the official site,

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread Declan Kelly
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:23:20PM +1100, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: > Please feel free to spread the word and please reply to this > email to let us know where this is being announced. Announcement was made on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/flac.audio/posts/10154824982999519 -- -Dec.

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread Declan Kelly
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 07:40:57PM +, maurit...@xs4all.nl wrote: > > FLAC 1.2.1 is the last version that works on Win95/98/NT4/2000 and > > also it still has in_flac.dll (a plugin for Winamp 2.x). Also 1.2.1 > > is the latest official binaries that don't require SSE2. So it can > > be useful

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 01 13:46:20, mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote: > I also notice that on sourceforge: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ > there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries > with know security holes. Does that mean the windows binaries, specifically, do

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread MauritsVB
> On 1 Jan 2017, at 07:54, lvqcl.mail wrote: > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> I also notice that on sourceforge: >> >>https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ >> >> there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries >> with know security

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2016-12-31 Thread lvqcl.mail
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: I also notice that on sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries with know security holes. What do people think of the idea of disabling downloads of old, known buggy Windows

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2016-12-31 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Hi all, The latest version of FLAC has been releases. See: https://xiph.org/flac/index.html https://xiph.org/flac/changelog.html The source tarball and Windows binaries are available (with md5 and sha256 checksums) at: http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/ The source tarball is