Re: [Flashcoders] can Flex classes be used within (Flash CS3) along with ActionScript?

2008-11-28 Thread Meinte van't Kruis
oops, that's not true, adding swc simply makes the flash compile if you use any classes in the swc without compiling them, it's what I use to exclude classes from compiling with actionscript, which isn't what you actually want On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Meinte van't Kruis [EMAIL

Re: [Flashcoders] can Flex classes be used within (Flash CS3) along with ActionScript?

2008-11-28 Thread Anthony Pace
I hate FLEX it doesn't make it easier in my opinion; for, if you want any real control you have to know AS3 anyway? FLEX is just a fast way of delivering cookie cutter apps. Meinte van't Kruis wrote: oops, that's not true, adding swc simply makes the flash compile if you use any classes in

[Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Latcho
Hi List, How can I pass a variable amount off function arguments to a next function ? Below the way I tried and which fails. While passing them they get combined I'd like to remain 5 variables for args_B and not a single string. Stijn CODE: testargs( a,b,{z:'zz'},[1,2,3],c ) private function

Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Meinte van't Kruis
I think I tried something with casting to array or using Function.apply, I'm pretty sureFunction.apply or call does the trick after messing around with it I decided it wasnt worth the mess and used array's instead.. On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Latcho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List,

Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Kenneth Kawamoto
You can accept them as an Array, e.g.: public function passingArgs(argsB:Array):void { trace(#args_B:,argsB.length); for(var i:int=0;iargsB.length;i++) { trace(argsB[i]); } } Kenneth Kawamoto http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/ Latcho wrote: Hi List, How can I pass a variable amount off

Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread David Hershberger
Ooh! Ooh! I just wrote this a few days before you asked. Here's my solution: public function call( rpcName: String, responder: Responder, rpcArgs: Array ): void { // NetConnection.call() takes a variable number of arguments after the // RPC

RE: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Cor
And there is also the ...rest-option -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Kawamoto Sent: vrijdag 28 november 2008 16:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args You can accept them as an

RE: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Cor
Oops, I did saw this one. Sorry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hershberger Sent: vrijdag 28 november 2008 17:39 To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args Ooh! Ooh! I just wrote this a few days before

Re: [Flashcoders] passing on ... args

2008-11-28 Thread Latcho
Thanks for the accept as Array tip which looks slimmer then apply(). But the apply I will test too, thanks. Cor what do you mean with ...rest option. Isn't that what I am trying to use (and pass on) Cor wrote: And there is also the ...rest-option -Original Message- From: [EMAIL