Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread David Hunter
Hi all, Really pleased that my original question has generated so much positive discussion, debate and learning on MVC. For me it has certainly shed some light on different ways to implement it and probably some improvements or different approaches I could take in the future. Currently I connect

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Ross Sclafani
yay me! Ross P. Sclafani design / technology / creative http://ross.sclafani.net http://www.twitter.com/rosssclafani http://www.linkedin.com/in/rosssclafani [347] 204.5714 let go of even your longest held beliefs, the only truth is in observation. On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:27 AM, David Hunter wro

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Paul Andrews
On 07/03/2012 15:37, Ross Sclafani wrote: yay me! Indeed! Your MVC introductory example was superb. Paul Ross P. Sclafani design / technology / creative http://ross.sclafani.net http://www.twitter.com/rosssclafani http://www.linkedin.com/in/rosssclafani [347] 204.5714 let go of even yo

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread John McCormack
Issues which have not been resolved has to do with how the logic is distributed amongst MVC partners. So if anyone comes across an example in which they are uncertain, please let us hear about it. On that subject, the book by Joel Hooks' and Lindsey Fallow: "ActionScript Developers Guide to

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Ross Sclafani
sounds about right. Ross P. Sclafani design / technology / creative http://ross.sclafani.net http://www.twitter.com/rosssclafani http://www.linkedin.com/in/rosssclafani [347] 204.5714 let go of even your longest held beliefs, the only truth is in observation. On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:29 AM, John

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
So a view can possibly have its own MVC within it? As long as the view is the only one using the data? View Controller View Model View View Or am I interp. this incorrectly? Best, Karl On Mar 7, 2012, at 10:29 AM, John McCormack wrote: Issues which have not been resolved has to do with how

RE: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Cor
I have an example of that. If you wish I can send it to you Best regards, Cor van Dooren -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Karl DeSaulniers Sent: woensdag 7 maart 2012 21:16 To: Flash Coders

RE: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Cor
Instead of sending, everyone can get it here: www.codobyte.com/MVC.zip Best regards, Cor van Dooren -Original Message- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Karl DeSaulniers Sent: woensdag 7 maart 2012 21:16 To: F

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Peter Ginneberge
What he was asking was where does certain logic go, such as: where do you check whether an email address is valid. So if only the view cares about the valid email address, you can do so in the view, otherwise move the logic to the controller. It also depends on how strict you are about what

Re: [Flashcoders] MVC style Correction

2012-03-07 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
I see. Thanks. Karl On Mar 7, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Peter Ginneberge wrote: What he was asking was where does certain logic go, such as: where do you check whether an email address is valid. So if only the view cares about the valid email address, you can do so in the view, otherwise move