[Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Ross Sclafani
From: Ross Sclafani Date: February 16, 2012 2:39:34 AM EST To: Cor Cc: Flash Coders List , flashcoder...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: MVC feel free to hit me up any time ill try to have time to respong none the less, this should get you started: /* * Model.as * * mvc.Model; */ package mv

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Beatrix Krümmer-Frau
perfect! Can I use this for my Flash students? Am 16.02.2012 08:59, schrieb Ross Sclafani: From: Ross Sclafani Date: February 16, 2012 2:39:34 AM EST To: Cor Cc: Flash Coders List, flashcoder...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: MVC feel free to hit me up any time ill try to have time to respong

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Andrews
Excellent job. I have one small point, on a practical level. For the views, in particular, I don't usually pass arguments to the constructor. It's not such a big deal for code-only examples, but in my flash world I mix my components between stuff created dynamically and things created in the

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread tom rhodes
traditional vanilla MVC tends to use composition like the example given, check out robotlegs if you don't like it :) then you inject dependencies instead of passing them around and everything gets a bit more loosely coupled... On 16 February 2012 11:46, Paul Andrews wrote: > Excellent job. > > I

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Andrews
On 16/02/2012 10:54, tom rhodes wrote: traditional vanilla MVC tends to use composition like the example given, check out robotlegs if you don't like it :) then you inject dependencies instead of passing them around and everything gets a bit more loosely coupled... It's not a question of not li

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Andrews
On 16/02/2012 11:11, Paul Andrews wrote: On 16/02/2012 10:54, tom rhodes wrote: traditional vanilla MVC tends to use composition like the example given, check out robotlegs if you don't like it :) then you inject dependencies instead of passing them around and everything gets a bit more loosely

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread tom rhodes
um, Ross gave it i think dude. i didn't give any code examples :) maybe you missed the smiley after i said "if you don't like it", perhaps shoudl have been a ;). what problems do you have using assets mad ein the IDE with mvc? On 16 February 2012 12:21, Paul Andrews wrote: > On 16/02/2012 11:1

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Paul Andrews
On 16/02/2012 12:04, tom rhodes wrote: um, Ross gave it i think dude. Yes, I posted a correction.. i didn't give any code examples :) maybe you missed the smiley after i said "if you don't like it", perhaps shoudl have been a ;). what problems do you have using assets mad ein the IDE with mvc

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Ross Sclafani
I have a fuller framework that details a view life cycle, subModels, a Controller tree, animated transitions on change() and more. The classes I wrote are just the simplest examples that I thought would get people started. I'll get the framework polished up and open sourced to Github if you guys

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Ross Sclafani
Absolutely. Good MVC should be taught at birth. Ross P. Sclafani Owner / Creative Director Neuromantic Industries http://www.neuromantic.com http://ross.sclafani.net http://www.twitter.com/rosssclafani 347.204.5714 On Feb 16, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Beatrix Krümmer-Frau wrote: > perfect! Can I use th

RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Cor
-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Ross Sclafani Sent: donderdag 16 februari 2012 14:28 To: Flash Coders List Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC I have a fuller framework that details a view life cycle, subModels, a Controller tree, ani

RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread jchilcott
___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread jchilcott
sage Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC From: "Cor" Date: Thu, February 16, 2012 8:39 am To: "'Flash Coders List'" Ross, And you did get people started. At least me! I am also very interested in your fuller framework. I don't wish to use the big fram

RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-16 Thread Cor
Sent: donderdag 16 februari 2012 15:07 To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC (UGH... I hate RTF Web editors) RobotLegs is not a big framework at all. In comparison with most of the other frameworks out there, it's overhead is far far less than ones like Cairngorm, Sprin

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-17 Thread Peter Ginneberge
uot; Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:07 PM Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC Main problem that I see with the code that was posted is that it breaks a major MVC rule and teaches a real bad habit: Views shouldn't have any knowledge of Models and Models shouldn't care who's usin

Re: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC

2012-02-17 Thread Ross Sclafani
he above article: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller#History > > regards, > Muzak > > > ----- Original Message - From: > To: "Flash Coders List" > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:07 PM > Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Fwd: MVC