RE: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-22 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>> Head on over to >>> http://labs.macromedia.com/ and play around, you might change your >>> mind. >> >>Wake me when there is an OSX alpha. ;-) >> >>Flex looks great, but not great enough to switch development platforms. >>-- >>Troy You Mac people are always so grumpy. ;) The Mac looks great,

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-22 Thread Troy Rollins
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Merrill, Jason wrote: Head on over to http://labs.macromedia.com/ and play around, you might change your mind. Wake me when there is an OSX alpha. ;-) Flex looks great, but not great enough to switch development platforms. -- Troy RPSystems, Ltd. http://www.rpsy

RE: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-22 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>commercial crap: >>remember Generator ? >>1.5k just to dynamically load JPGs in it ... >>marketing crap really Cedric - not sure I understand the basis of your rant. Are you upset with the current pricing of Flex - that 15k is outrageous? Or 1k for Flexbuilder 2 is still over priced for what it

RE: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-22 Thread Nick Weekes
mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo commercial crap: remember Generator ? 1.5k just to dynamically load JPGs in it ... marketing crap really > 15k. When Flexbuilder 2 comes out, you can create .swfs without the > server, and it is rumored to be under $1000. Flex Ente

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-22 Thread Cedric Muller
05 12:26 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2 is available? Regards, Danton Merrill, Jason wrote: How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex installed on

RE: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Merrill, Jason
rning Solutions | icfconsulting.com >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danton Chin >>Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:26 PM >>To: Flashcoders mailing list >>Subject: Re: [Fl

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread JesterXL
eir pricing yet. - Original Message - From: "Danton Chin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2 is av

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Danton Chin
How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2 is available? Regards, Danton Merrill, Jason wrote: How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex installed on it? Could I do this with one of my web hosting providers then? Check with Adobe

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread JesterXL
...scratch that idea, then. I just rent the shared box, I don't own it. Thanks anyway. - Original Message - From: "Merrill, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:59 AM Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] R

RE: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Merrill, Jason
>>How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex installed on it? >>Could I do this with one of my web hosting providers then? Check with Adobe, but in November Macromedia Sales told me as long as we had a legal Flex 1.5 license installed in one location, they would allow us to take the

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Mike Boutin
ed, that's illegal. Flex 2 does not have this legal requirement, and once you create a SWF, you can do whatever you want with it. - Original Message - From: "Adrian Showater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: [Flashcoders] RE: Fl

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread JesterXL
2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo That's not 100% true. You must have a Flex license for the server where the swf is served from, but you don't have to have Flex installed on it. I've worked with a couple of clients who use this configuration. Spike On 12/

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Spike
. > > Flex 2 does not have this legal requirement, and once you create a SWF, you > can do whatever you want with it. > > - Original Message - > From: "Adrian Showater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:11 AM > Subj

Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread JesterXL
s not have this legal requirement, and once you create a SWF, you can do whatever you want with it. - Original Message - From: "Adrian Showater" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo JesterXL, please

[Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo

2005-12-21 Thread Adrian Showater
JesterXL, please clarify: "Flex 1.5 and 2 allow you to compile stand alone SWF's. Flex 1.5, however, requires the Flex server to be installed on the box where the SWF is deployed to." Am I correct in assuming that you mean that Flex 1 requires the server while all subsequent versions do not? A