Matrix scaling also does the same thing - does not scale Blur/filter
properties.
I've tried this...
var snapshot:BitmapData = new BitmapData(121,88,true,0x);
//Matrix to scale the new image
var myMatrix = new Matrix();
myMatrix.translate(-23,-19);
myMatrix.scale(0.25, 0.25);
snapshot.dra
try to use the matrix to scale ur mc to see if that persists
On 4/11/07, Zeh Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this works (But I wish it did). I have a
> HOLDERMC.CHILDMC.MCwithblurfilterapplied
> I'm scaling HOLDERMC 200% and the blur does not scale on any child MCs.
> All I
I don't think this works (But I wish it did). I have a
HOLDERMC.CHILDMC.MCwithblurfilterapplied
I'm scaling HOLDERMC 200% and the blur does not scale on any child MCs.
All I've been able to do is apply a new filter to the MC with scaled
properties (eg. apply a new filter with a 20x20 blue when
Create a holder movieclip as its parent; the inner movieclip is the one
who holds the filter, but the holder movieclip is the one who gets scaled.
I don't think this works (But I wish it did). I have a
HOLDERMC.CHILDMC.MCwithblurfilterapplied
I'm scaling HOLDERMC 200% and the blur does not scal
I've noticed if I apply for example a 10x 10y blue filter to a MC, then
scale it 200%, it retains the 10 pixel blur - which actually makes the MC
look less blured because the blur has not been scaled.
Is there any way to lock in a filter blur so that when it's scaled, it
looks
proportional?
Cr
I've noticed if I apply for example a 10x 10y blue filter to a MC, then
scale it 200%, it retains the 10 pixel blur - which actually makes the MC
look less blured because the blur has not been scaled.
Is there any way to lock in a filter blur so that when it's scaled, it looks
proportional?
_
6 matches
Mail list logo