Re: [Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications

2006-02-02 Thread Chris Velevitch
On 2/2/06, Mike Mountain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's wrong with the new external interface api? Nothing. The external interface api is stated to be better and more flexible than fscommands, but you still need to know which container you are talking to and what it can do. Chris -- Chris V

RE: [Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications

2006-02-02 Thread Mike Mountain
What's wrong with the new external interface api? M ___ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Re: [Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications

2006-02-01 Thread Chris Velevitch
As I understand the fscommand, the allowable values to the fscommand depends on the container to the .swf file. (see http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flash/8/main/1596.html) So, for projectors like Zinc, the list of fscommand values is very large and well documented in the Zinc documentation. In

RE: [Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications

2006-02-01 Thread Bjorn Schultheiss
Subject: [Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications We're currently looking to create a custom flash projector wrapper for an expo application that is directx driven. We'd like to superimpose a transparent flash interface on 3d rendered graphics in real time I know Zinc has function

[Flashcoders] using flash for UI in applications

2006-02-01 Thread Andreas Rønning
We're currently looking to create a custom flash projector wrapper for an expo application that is directx driven. We'd like to superimpose a transparent flash interface on 3d rendered graphics in real time I know Zinc has functionality that lets you call DLLs via FScommand, but i'd like to know