serious... about this.
Jim
On 7/11/07, Steven Sacks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> while(i--)a[i].n.t();
You ain't what?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mail
> while(i--)a[i].n.t();
You ain't what?
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Ad
Why are you using INSANELY long variable names like 'element' and
'animation'? And why the spaces?
Shouldn't that read:
var i:Number = a.length;
while(i--)a[i].n.t();
:-)
Before anyone flames me... I'm kidding.
Jim
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figle
Oops!
var i:Number = elements.length;
while (i--)
{
elements[i].animation.update();
}
Steven Sacks wrote:
Decrementing is faster than incrementing.
var i:Number = elements.length;
while (--i)
{
elements[i].animation.update();
}
___
Flashcod
Decrementing is faster than incrementing.
var i:Number = elements.length;
while (--i)
{
elements[i].animation.update();
}
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/m
I heard using FOR is very slow. Instead, try WHILE (much faster):
var i = -1;
while (++i wrote:
This will happen if elements.length is undefined. i will never equal
undefined. Use i < elements.length
P
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>> [EMAIL PR
This will happen if elements.length is undefined. i will never equal
undefined. Use i < elements.length
P
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daniel
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:52 PM
>> To: flashcoders@chattyfig.
> I feel really stupid right now. No, not that stupid. I mean
> really stupid.
> Take the highest level of stupid you can imagine and double
> that. Yes, now you've got it!
>
> I have a class named Game.
>
> Game.start() calls setInterval(this, "update", 1000).
>
> Game.update() calls _game
Why do you have so many hoops to jump through?
Try changing your for loop to this:
for (var i:Number = 0; i < elements.length; i++)
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daniel
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:52 PM
To: flashcoders@chatt
Is it possible that the i != elements.length inside the for loop leads to
trouble? Maybe if it's change to imailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of daniel
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 10:52 AM
To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Subject: [Flashcoders] +Infinite Loop -Dignity
I feel really stupid
10 matches
Mail list logo
