RE: [Flashcoders] Cache Killer... is it bulletproof ???

2007-03-05 Thread Steven Sacks | BLITZ
The user would have to reset their clock and make the request at the EXACT SAME MILLISECOND in time. It's nigh impossible. It will never ever ever EVER happen. You're good to go. var d:Date = new Date(); var noCache:String = String(d.getTime()); var xmlPath:String =

RE: [Flashcoders] Cache Killer... is it bulletproof ???

2007-03-05 Thread Karina Steffens
Also check out my blog entry on the subject - http://blog.neo-archaic.net/2006/08/02/nocache-for-javascript-and-flash.htm The Flash IDE doesn't like the cache-busters so you need to test System.capabilities.playerType before appending the query. Karina -Original Message- From: David

Re: [Flashcoders] Cache Killer... is it bulletproof ???

2007-03-03 Thread T. Michael Keesey
Actually using a random string is not a good idea because there is a chance, however small, that it will fail. Using new Date().getTime(), as the OP mentioned (and erroneously called random), will work every time (unless, of course, the user resets their clock during the session--and even then

Re: [Flashcoders] Cache Killer... is it bulletproof ???

2007-03-02 Thread Zeh Fernando
Is this method bulletproof (it works in all browsers on all operating systems)? Is this something that you would really rely on for big projects? Has anyone ever used this method and had big problems with it or even minor glitches? It is bulletproof. There's no reason why it shouldn't work.

Re: [Flashcoders] Cache Killer... is it bulletproof ???

2007-03-02 Thread Mike and Stephie
Hi David ! Yes this mostly seems to work quite well. The thing is to make sure that all assets are called using this random string-- that none sneaks through unintentionally Kind regards Prema David Bellerive wrote: I've read that appending a random query string ( example : new