RE: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially)

2006-10-02 Thread Steven Sacks | BLITZ
Could we keep the language on this list down a tad? Profanity filters used by corporations to keep tabs on their employees' email communication are just as important as keeping track of what their employees are talking about to ensure vital company secrets aren't being let out. In this

RE: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially)

2006-10-02 Thread Nick Weekes
list Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially) Could we keep the language on this list down a tad? Profanity filters used by corporations to keep tabs on their employees' email communication are just as important as keeping track of what their employees are talking about

Re: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially)

2006-10-02 Thread Michael Bedar
sad but true On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Steven Sacks | BLITZ wrote: Could we keep the language on this list down a tad? Profanity filters used by corporations to keep tabs on their employees' email communication are just as important as keeping track of what their employees are talking

Re: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially)

2006-10-01 Thread eric dolecki
I respect Jason's comments. He isn't being paranoid, he's simply being polite. - e. On 9/29/06, Cedric Muller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: living in paranoid land ? Same s***. Could we keep the language on this list down a tad? That's the second time you've said that in your current thread

Re: [Flashcoders] Profanity - (to Lieven especially)

2006-09-29 Thread Cedric Muller
living in paranoid land ? Same s***. Could we keep the language on this list down a tad? That's the second time you've said that in your current thread today. Some of us are on large corporate networks that get monitored, and I don't really want that word associated in any way on any report