>>> Head on over to
>>> http://labs.macromedia.com/ and play around, you might change your
>>> mind.
>>
>>Wake me when there is an OSX alpha. ;-)
>>
>>Flex looks great, but not great enough to switch development
platforms.
>>--
>>Troy
You Mac people are always so grumpy. ;)
The Mac looks great,
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Merrill, Jason wrote:
Head on over to
http://labs.macromedia.com/ and play around, you might change your
mind.
Wake me when there is an OSX alpha. ;-)
Flex looks great, but not great enough to switch development platforms.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsy
>>commercial crap:
>>remember Generator ?
>>1.5k just to dynamically load JPGs in it ...
>>marketing crap really
Cedric - not sure I understand the basis of your rant. Are you upset
with the current pricing of Flex - that 15k is outrageous? Or 1k for
Flexbuilder 2 is still over priced for what it
mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo
commercial crap:
remember Generator ?
1.5k just to dynamically load JPGs in it ...
marketing crap really
> 15k. When Flexbuilder 2 comes out, you can create .swfs without the
> server, and it is rumored to be under $1000. Flex Ente
05 12:26 PM
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo
How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2
is
available?
Regards,
Danton
Merrill, Jason wrote:
How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex
installed
on
rning Solutions | icfconsulting.com
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flashcoders-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danton Chin
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:26 PM
>>To: Flashcoders mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [Fl
eir pricing yet.
- Original Message -
From: "Danton Chin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo
How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2 is
av
How expensive is a Flex 1.5 license? And will that change when Flex 2 is
available?
Regards,
Danton
Merrill, Jason wrote:
How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex installed on
it?
Could I do this with one of my web hosting providers then?
Check with Adobe
...scratch that idea, then. I just rent the shared box, I don't own it.
Thanks anyway.
- Original Message -
From: "Merrill, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] R
>>How do you have a license for a server, but not have Flex installed on
it?
>>Could I do this with one of my web hosting providers then?
Check with Adobe, but in November Macromedia Sales told me as long as we
had a legal Flex 1.5 license installed in one location, they would allow
us to take the
So OpenLaszlo may be a better solution as it does not need a OpenLaszlo
licence to have a standalone swf on the server?
- Original Message -
From: "Spike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list"
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:27 AM
Subject:
2005 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] RE: Flex vs OpenLaszo
That's not 100% true.
You must have a Flex license for the server where the swf is served
from, but you don't have to have Flex installed on it.
I've worked with a couple of clients who use this configuration.
Spike
On 12/
That's not 100% true.
You must have a Flex license for the server where the swf is served
from, but you don't have to have Flex installed on it.
I've worked with a couple of clients who use this configuration.
Spike
On 12/21/05, JesterXL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, Flex 1 and Flex 1.5.
>
Nope, Flex 1 and Flex 1.5.
Flex 1 and Flex 1.5 require a server if you wish to remain legal. While you
can easily create SWF's from Flex 1 and Flex 1.5 and run them independently,
unless they were served from a server that has Flex 1 or 1.5 installed,
that's illegal.
Flex 2 does not have this
14 matches
Mail list logo
