John McCormack wrote:
> Thanks Kerry,
>
> The FB3 plug-in worked well for me, so that's the route I prefer.
>
> I keep looking at versions of Eclipse and wonder if Java EE at 190MB might
> clog up my PC with things I never use. However, an fdt guy recommended the
> same version but I probably won'
Thanks Kerry,
The FB3 plug-in worked well for me, so that's the route I prefer.
I keep looking at versions of Eclipse and wonder if Java EE at 190MB
might clog up my PC with things I never use. However, an fdt guy
recommended the same version but I probably won't code with Java
although I may
] Recommended set-up for Flash Builder 4?
Steven Sacks wrote:
> NDA? Flash Builder 4 is out. Nobody is prohibited from talking about it
> anymore. ;)
Right. And Director will rise again. Allen told me.
Now I have to go shoot myself for breaking my NDA ;-)
Cordially,
Kerry Th
Steven Sacks wrote:
> NDA? Flash Builder 4 is out. Nobody is prohibited from talking about it
> anymore. ;)
Right. And Director will rise again. Allen told me.
Now I have to go shoot myself for breaking my NDA ;-)
Cordially,
Kerry Thompson
___
Flashco
NDA? Flash Builder 4 is out. Nobody is prohibited from talking about it
anymore. ;)
On 4/10/2010 1:44 PM, Kerry Thompson wrote:
John McCormack wrote:
Which setup do you recommend for Flash Builder 4?
Stand-alone or plug-in?
If plug-in, which eclipse version?
I would use the plug-in version
John McCormack wrote:
> Which setup do you recommend for Flash Builder 4?
>
> Stand-alone or plug-in?
> If plug-in, which eclipse version?
I would use the plug-in version. I've heard from very reliable sources
that there are some issues with the standalone version--I'm not sure
what the issues are
6 matches
Mail list logo