On 27.05.2010 02:32, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> New version, fixes a few bugs where #ifdefs were missing.
>
> Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware as described in
> http://rayer.ic.cz/elektro/spipgm.htm
>
> Known bugs/limitations:
> - Won't compile/work on non-x86 architectures. Guards agains
Add Nvidia nForce MCP61/MCP65/MCP67/MCP78S/MCP73/MCP79 SPI flashing support.
This code is totally untested and may fry your flash chip, explode
mysteriously and abduct your dog.
Do NOT try to read/write/erase with this code until we know that it
behaves correctly.
Logs from "flashrom -V" on all n
On 27.05.2010 01:19, Joseph Smith wrote:
> On 05/26/2010 06:12 PM, Michael Karcher wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 19:23 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
>>> +int rayer_bitbang_spi_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + /* Pick a default value for now. */
>>> + lpt_iobase = 0x378;
>>> +
>>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:28:01AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:30:26PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
>
> Thanks, committed with a few more re-orderings so that the respective
> parts of the "flashrom -L > foo" output for board-enable boa
Hi,
quick review below, I think this patch needs one more round.
I'm a bit undecided whether it's really a good idea to merge the tables
for good and bad boards, I kinda liked them being separate tables. But I
guess for users it's more intuitive to have one big table.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09
On 05/26/2010 06:12 PM, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 19:23 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
+int rayer_bitbang_spi_init(void)
+{
+ /* Pick a default value for now. */
+ lpt_iobase = 0x378;
+
+ get_io_perms();
Ah, direct port access for the parallel
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:30:45PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> It seems that this board is actually a 'Pro' version. At least it's addressed
> as 'Pro'
> in the list of boards, which requires board_enable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
Yep, thanks, r1015.
See also:
http://www.flashrom.o
Author: uwe
Date: Thu May 27 00:29:51 2010
New Revision: 1015
URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/1015
Log:
It seems that this board is actually a 'Pro' version. At least it's
addressed as 'Pro' in the list of boards, which requires board_enable.
See also: http://www.flashrom.org/pip
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:30:26PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
Thanks, committed with a few more re-orderings so that the respective
parts of the "flashrom -L > foo" output for board-enable boards is
identical to the "sort foo" output.
Uwe.
--
http://hermann-uw
Author: uwe
Date: Thu May 27 00:26:44 2010
New Revision: 1014
URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/coreboot/changeset/1014
Log:
Sort boards in board-enable table alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann
Modified:
trunk/board_enable.c
Modified: trunk/board_enable.c
=
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 19:23 +0200 schrieb Carl-Daniel Hailfinger:
> +int rayer_bitbang_spi_init(void)
> +{
> + /* Pick a default value for now. */
> + lpt_iobase = 0x378;
> +
> + get_io_perms();
Ah, direct port access for the parallel port. While this is definitely
the way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Here is DOS version of flashrom with the patch applied:
wget http://assembler.cz/rayer.exe
Rudolf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkv9k
It seems that this board is actually a 'Pro' version. At least it's addressed
as 'Pro'
in the list of boards, which requires board_enable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
---
board_enable.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board_enable.c b/board_enable.c
i
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov
---
board_enable.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board_enable.c b/board_enable.c
index 4251601..963bf58 100644
--- a/board_enable.c
+++ b/board_enable.c
@@ -1402,12 +1402,12 @@ struct board_pciid_enable board_pciid_enable
On Wed, 26 May 2010 19:23:18 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
wrote:
> On 26.05.2010 16:31, Joseph Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 May 2010 16:26:03 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>>
>>> Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware as described in
>>> http://rayer.ic.cz/elektro/spipgm.htm
>>>
>>> Thanks
On 26.05.2010 16:31, Joseph Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 16:26:03 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware as described in
>> http://rayer.ic.cz/elektro/spipgm.htm
>>
>> Thanks go to Martin Rehak for giving me his SPIPGM source code as
>> reference.
>
On Wed, 26 May 2010 16:26:03 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
wrote:
> Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware as described in
> http://rayer.ic.cz/elektro/spipgm.htm
>
> Thanks go to Martin Rehak for giving me his SPIPGM source code as
> reference.
>
> Should work on all supported platforms (mayb
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 17:54 +0400 schrieb Peter Lemenkov:
> > I fully appreciate the idea of merging the tables from print.c and
> > print_wiki.c . Do you know
> > http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/1044/
> > which I submitted with basically the same idea?
> Unfortunately I wasn't aware of
Add support for RayeR SPIPGM hardware as described in
http://rayer.ic.cz/elektro/spipgm.htm
Thanks go to Martin Rehak for giving me his SPIPGM source code as reference.
Should work on all supported platforms (maybe even Windows, not sure
about that), but you may have to unload any parport drivers
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Arne Georg Gleditsch:
> On 26. mai 2010 15:56, Michael Karcher wrote:
> > Try to find an lspci dump of that DL145 and check whether some PCI
> > signature is different. If not, check whether DMI contains some string
> As Google has it, it would appe
On 26. mai 2010 15:56, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Try to find an lspci dump of that DL145 and check whether some PCI
> signature is different. If not, check whether DMI contains some string
> that makes it possible to tell the systems apart. If nothing helps, PCI
> subsystem IDs (not the normal vendo
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Arne Georg Gleditsch:
> Attached is a patch to board_enable.c for the HP DL165 board.
> Apparently, the PCI signature of the DL165 is identical to the DL145,
> but the enable pins are placed differently... :/ I'm not sure what the
> best way to hand
Hi,
Attached is a patch to board_enable.c for the HP DL165 board.
Apparently, the PCI signature of the DL165 is identical to the DL145,
but the enable pins are placed differently... :/ I'm not sure what the
best way to handle that is.
Signed-off-by: Arne Georg Gleditsch
--
Misha, could you please test this patch with the satasii programmer on
your CurtisWright Raptor and ack it if it works? A verbose log from a
successful write would be appreciated.
The patch applies on top of an otherwise unpatched tree with latest
flashrom from svn.
Convert all PCI-based external
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 26.05.2010 08:22, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
>
>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The internal programmer needs correct information about flash_base and
>>> chip window top/bottom alignment on non-x86 before it can be used. Abo
On 26.05.2010 08:22, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> The internal programmer needs correct information about flash_base and
>> chip window top/bottom alignment on non-x86 before it can be used. Abort
>> any internal programmer action for now unti
Am Mittwoch, den 26.05.2010, 10:51 +0400 schrieb Peter Lemenkov:
> With this patch boards info is stored in one common place. Previously, the
> information about different boards was spreaded between few different places,
> and manual synchronization was required (which already led to some
> discr
27 matches
Mail list logo
