Stefan Tauner wrote:
> Heavily influenced by a discussion with (and based on code from) Peter Stuge.
> ---
> Peter Stuge argued all evening with me that the mandatory -p parameter
> is a regression and should be fixed, because the common case is -p internal
> and that was the default programmer for
Heavily influenced by a discussion with (and based on code from) Peter Stuge.
---
Peter Stuge argued all evening with me that the mandatory -p parameter
is a regression and should be fixed, because the common case is -p internal
and that was the default programmer for most of the installations espe
This should get rid of the need to specify the laptop force parameter
on T60 and X60 that are using one of the Intel 94x northbridges and
are known to have no interfering EC.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner
---
board_enable.c | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/boar
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:56:15 +0200
Stefan Tauner wrote:
> + if (board == NULL && cb_vendor != NULL && cb_model != NULL) {
> + board = board_match_name(cb_vendor, cb_model);
> + if (!board) { /* Failure is an option here, because many cb
> boards don't require an enabl
Author: stefanct
Date: Mon Sep 24 23:29:29 2012
New Revision: 1605
URL: http://flashrom.org/trac/flashrom/changeset/1605
Log:
Fix flashrom running on boards with coreboot.
In r1577 we removed the discrimination of coreboot IDs and user-specified
mainboards. The problem is that the board enable co
