On 20.05.2010 21:14, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>
>> - If we want to get flashrom working with libpayload, we'd better not
>> rely on the more exotic features of libpci because every such feature
>> has to be coded up and I don't
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> - If we want to get flashrom working with libpayload, we'd better not
> rely on the more exotic features of libpci because every such feature
> has to be coded up and I don't think we want to link flashrom-as-payload
> agains
On 14.05.2010 11:51, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2010/5/14 Stefan Reinauer :
>
>> On 5/14/10 4:00 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>>
>>> libpci < 2.2.4 can not store class info in struct pci_dev.
>>> Read class info manually and store it in a separate variable.
>>>
>
>
>> Wouldn't i
2010/5/14 Stefan Reinauer :
> On 5/14/10 4:00 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> libpci < 2.2.4 can not store class info in struct pci_dev.
>> Read class info manually and store it in a separate variable.
> Wouldn't it make more sense to ask people to update their libpci?
> pciutils 2.2.3 is mor
On 5/14/10 4:00 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> libpci < 2.2.4 can not store class info in struct pci_dev.
> Read class info manually and store it in a separate variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
>
Wouldn't it make more sense to ask people to update their libpci?
pciutils 2
libpci < 2.2.4 can not store class info in struct pci_dev.
Read class info manually and store it in a separate variable.
Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Index: flashrom-libpci_old_workaround/board_enable.c
===
--- flashrom-lib
