Hi Toke,
> On Sep 29, 2019, at 21:08, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> wrote:
>
> flent-users writes:
>
> > Hi Toke,
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rich Brown writes:
> >>
> >> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes
flent-users writes:
> Hi Toke,
>
>> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>> wrote:
>>
>> Rich Brown writes:
>>
>> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
>> > better plots (see below).
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a who
Hi Toke,
> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> wrote:
>
> Rich Brown writes:
>
> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
> > better plots (see below).
>
> Great!
>
> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz
> >
Rich Brown writes:
> Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
> better plots (see below).
Great!
> Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz
> Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will
Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much better
plots (see below). Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my
Mac 2.5 GHz Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1094930/65833956-1a950b00-e2a4-11e9-9353-b525b
