Hi Faiz, That's pretty much what I am looking for Faiz. Thanks a lot for sharing.
Only instead of a plugin/addon I expected, the framework can be accessed as a cacheable Runtime Shared Library. Thanks, Ram Manoj Kongara. On Feb 4, 6:35 pm, Faizul Haque <faizra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ram, > Hope you are doing good. Recently I have posted a blog regarding same issue. > Please go through it and hope it will sorted out your > confusion.http://faizrana.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A... > > Regards, > Faiz > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Ram Manoj Kongara <k.ramma...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > Just want to bring forth an issue to the notice of the Flex community > > at large what I have noticed. > > > In simple terms why Flex Framework is not introduced as a plugin/addon > > to the browser to be used along with flash player to run a flex > > application? > > > The minimum size of SWF file created when a simple flex application is > > built is 273KB. > > (One can consider the flex application file just contains only an > > mx:application tag) > > > Here each flex based SWF is packaged together with the Flex framework > > and other inherent/dependent frameworks by Adobe like for Charts. As a > > result it was a redundant piece of data we transfer across the Web > > each time our Flex application is accessed by a user on a session > > basis. > > > In simple terms, packaging the Flex framework together with our > > application code in an SWF is creating initial load time of our Flex > > application each time. This is creating redundancy in bandwidth usage. > > > I logged a bug for the same with Adobe bug and issue management. > > > Finally when it comes to business terms 'Performance matters'. > > We are midway in our development using Flex to cater to the Enterprise > > range of products our Company does business, it was decided to switch > > over to Silverlight by Microsoft. > > I am not convinced with the decision by our Top Management but finally > > has to vote for Performance. > > > Microsoft I feel, cannot deliver cutting edge technology like Google > > or Adobe because it contains/grows closed box innovators. > > > Guess the issue must have been thought out earlier by Adobe but has > > sidelined it as not feasible. > > > Thanks, > > Ram Manoj Kongara. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Flex India Community" group. > > To post to this group, send email to flex_in...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > flex_india+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<flex_india%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex_india?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex India Community" group. To post to this group, send email to flex_in...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to flex_india+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex_india?hl=en.
