There's one thing you missed here
I have this:
var params:Object = new Object();
params.viewId = _viewId;
itemService.send(params);
And it works ok...
But If I try this:
var params:Object = new Object();
params.viewId = _viewId;
params.foo = new
Hi, thanks for the reply. The reason for not simply using the VBox
solution is because the extended DateChooser must act as the date
chooser which pops up when the user clicks the icon next to the text
input field of a date field. The date field has a dropDownFactory
property which can point to a
try the labelField as label
and put the please select as prompt.
Cheers,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:07 PM, timgerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I an running into a problem, when I create a Actionscript ComboBox
like this:
[Bindable]
public var respArray: Array = [
That's what I was looking for thanks.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tracy Spratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can use an e4x expression to leave off the first row.
*Something*
like:
var xlData:XMLList = xmlData.children().(childIndex()0);
Tracy
I have the following XML being returned to my Flex application. How can parse
it so that it displays in a DataGrid?
I was able to get the XML to display in a textarea by using the following
code:
mx:TextArea id=myTextArea
text={ws.getContacts.lastResult.toXMLString()} width=100% height=253
how does Selenium differ from RIATest : http://riatest.com/
?
*artur :.*
- *www.artur.com*
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- *ph:646.797.3320*
Jarek Szczepanski wrote:
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com, phil swenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any thoughts on
nevermind...solved it...
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:03 PM, [p e r c e p t i c o n]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
what's the deal with swcs in flex3...in flex2 i simply add it to my lib
path and type local:somename/ and it works...
how does this work in flexbuilder3 ???
thanks
percy
FYI - I'm seeing the same thing as you with my tests - it looks like
only the first array element is available on the server side
(There may be a Flex/HTTP limitation here - not sure ).
var ipArray:Array = [];
var rowdata:String = '';
rowdata ='1234';
I haven't worked with the Google API's, so this is a guess, but I suspect that
Google is returning XML, and that you are doing some sort of parsing to convert
some of the XML into the hexadecimal number. If that is correct, you ought to
be able to use e4x to extract a string from the XML.
Then I'd use a custom component instead of mx:DateField itself, rather
than trying to shoehorn stuff into the existing DateField impl. It just
seems like you're setting yourself up for way more work than you need to is
all.
The order I'd try is:
1. Custom component instead of DateField, that
I have found that the mx.effects classes are very CPU intensive. I
have a project in which I had to replace all of the Move and Fade
effects with my own because they wew causing the CPU ( especially on
Windows ) to choke.
Jamie
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with getting no data through is because you're using a
non-dynamic object. Use:
var params : Object =
{
paramName: paramValue,
param2Name: param2Value
};
The reason is that the service code uses something like:
for(var key:* in params)
{
request.addParam(key, params[key]);
}
Maybe somebody else will have one, but I am not seeing a simple way to do this
in a more sophisticated manner. This leads me to the following question: Are
you experiencing performance problems? If not, I would suggest coding what
works, and not worrying about the overhead involved in a
WebService XML tends to have namespace issues.
Try adding this at the instance scope level:
default xml namespace = http://simpaq.com/service;;
Tracy
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of gabsaga
Sent: Thursday, July
OK no worries. That's what we do here (setting times to 12 on the way in and
out of the service). There's a SOAP date type (as opposed to dateTime), but
we try not to use it because Xfire produces them incorrectly, and Flex's
parser isn't robust enough to handle the rubbish data we get from Xfire
The .net Date stuff will work sensibly and probably just like Flash's, so
I'd start with copying their code and work from there :)
-Josh
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you 100% Josh but the better ones want the all might $$
and my company isn't
File a bug with a test case
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jamie S
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency
I have found that the mx.effects
Please note that you can implement toString() on the item class to do
anything you want. But that doesn't imply it's a good way to compare two
collections.
Perhaps you should reconsider whether you really need two collections
that may or may not be exactly the same. Or consider keeping a
I'd create a util class listens to CollectionChangeEvents from your
collection and keeps a list of what's added, a list of what's dirty, and a
list of what's removed. It'd probably take 2 hours to write and be a pretty
useful util class.
-Josh
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Gordon Smith
your first getEstimate() shoudl do it, the second will only return to
Object in Flex. Now, that said, I believe you need setters/getters on
all vars in your CFC, this might be the case for sending from Flex to
CF, but not sure, its been a whole year since I messed with CF that
much :) Also note
Hello Flexcoders,
Does Flex offer to save personalized configuration on the UI? Every user has
different preference about how the result can be viewed on UI. It's not
about the preference on the browser. It's about how to save the view of the
result retrieved by Flex from the server end.
Any
Hello all,
I'm migrating from as2 to as3 and had a question regarding dynamic
variables.
A very powerful feature of as2 was the ability to access variables
dynamically like:
for(var i:uint = 0; i 10; i++){
this['item_'+i] = i * 20;
}
I cant seem to replicate this type of functionality in
I created a custom component that extends Container. I have set the
width and height to 100%. When my component first comes up it resizes
as the parent resizes, but after the user uses the application, my
component gets into a state where it doesn't get sent measure events
any more. Any
You can still do that, but only on dynamic objects :)
anything that is defined as:
public dynamic class MyDynamicClass
var dynamicObject = new MyDynamicClass();
var dynamicObject2 = new Object();
var dynamicObject3 = {};
-Josh
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:05 AM, andrewedwards39 [EMAIL
As a guess, you're probably setting width and height somewhere instead of
calling setActualSize(width, height);
-Josh
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, wwwpl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a custom component that extends Container. I have set the
width and height to 100%. When my
My query is, as above,
Why should we use the states ? OR Why we should not use the states ?
Are there any scenarios where states come to your rescue ?
Having Cairngorm (ModelLocator/view) in picture, does it has any relation
with using states OR not using states ?
Is it a good practice to
Thanks all for the help.
Timgerr
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, timgerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I an running into a problem, when I create a Actionscript ComboBox
like this:
[Bindable]
public var respArray: Array = [
{label:},{label:Yes},{label:No},{label:N/A},{label:No
Hello all,
Yes it is me back asking more questions about dynamic ActionScript.
Here is my problem, I have this object that I populate a textimput box
Here us some of the code:
[Bindable]
public var sArray:Object = [{Name:Jane Doe,Age:26,ID:5}];
private function Test():void
{
for(var i:int =
I'm trying to pull a variable from an arrayCollection which I know is
type String.
Here's the code:
public var strEMail:String;
...
Private function ...
{
strEMail = GlobalVars.instance.acUser.getItemAt(0);
}
That above line of course throws an error
You can loop through looking for the child with ID x, or keep a reference
to it like you would any other variable.
var createdChildren : Object = {};
private function Test():void
{
for(var i:int = 0; ilength.sArray;i++){
var ti1:TextInput = new TextInput();
ti1.editable = false;
ti1.id
Have you tried
strEMail = String(GlobalVars.instance.acUser.getItemAt(0));
Do not have my machine in front of me to test but pretty sure you can cast
something that way. I know that's the way I do it to cast MovieClip names.
Regards,
Peter
On 7/17/08, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
