[flexcoders] Re: Dynamically binding a dataprovider in AS

Sean, Don't overlook the obvious. You may simply do this: bb.dataprovider = vs; -=Cliff> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Roman Protsiuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mx.binding.utils.BindingUtils.bindProperty(bb, "dataProvider", this, "vs"); > > R. > > On 6/8/07, zzwi89 <[EMAIL PRO

[flexcoders] Re: Flex Component kit

Patrick, You must define the XML namespace on the Application itself: http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; xmlns:ng="*"> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, {reduxdj} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Code hinting does not work: > > my example code: > > > http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"; layou

[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

Humorous that you say PureMVC ( 21 classes )is "on the heavy side", instead suggesting Nimbus ( 24 classes ) as an alternative. -=Cliff> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Hardy wrote: > > I'd consider those still being on the heavy side. One we use is called > Nimbus and can be found h

[flexcoders] Re: Lightweight framework

PS, PureMVC is only 21 classes because there are 11 interfaces, corresponding to their implementations. There are only 11 actual classes in PureMVC. Get back to me when you get your scales fixed :) -=Cliff> --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Cliff Hall" wrote: > > Hu