I suppose it gives you the performance of "struct" and the advantadges of
typed/mapped objects
The properties of a CFC are NOT typed, thats the problem. We can type the
argument of a CF function, but not the property of a CFC... This means that
using properies is sensitive to errors.
Greetz Er
On Friday 24 November 2006 15:42, Rick Root wrote:
> Why write your own, non-optimized code, to have Coldfusion return an
> array of objects. Why not just return the query and let CF do the
> conversion.
Because dealing with an array of anonymous objects is a pain.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to c
I realize this discussion is all related to Cairngorn, and I don't use
Cairngorn or really know what it is... but here's a question.
If a CFC method returns a QUERY, then Coldfusion uses code optimized (in
theory by Adobe engineers) in the flex connector to convert the query
object to an array
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 17:21, Rick Schmitty wrote:
> Well yes, creating objects will always be more overhead, I should of
> asked: Does java and php show such drastic differences when making the
AFAIK, Java only does objects, and PHP only does non-objects (this is why PHP
has such bonkers
_
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de Dirk Eismann
Envoyé : jeudi 23 novembre 2006 10:29
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : RE: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up to 10x gain,
avoid cf object creation
Yes, I also noticed this.
I made a test
groups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] ColdFusion and Flex Integration - up
to 10x gain, avoid cf object creation
Some time ago i experienced with java versions of the value
objects. This also gives a significant improvement.
Greetz Erik
6 matches
Mail list logo
