---
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Matt,
Unless I have a bug in my compiler(s), I believe I
ps.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:37 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
> DataBinding
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Back posting huh!
>
&g
: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:37 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi Matt,
Back posting huh!
Thx for the answer.
> Now what I don't remember is if when we instantiate via the Array if
the
> MXMLObject
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
> Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:25 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
> DataBinding
ginal Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aldo Bucchi
Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 3:25 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Nested faceless components. keeping IDs and
DataBinding
Hi all,
It would be great to have IDs and dat
Hi all,
It would be great to have IDs and databinding available to faceless
data structures.
Unfortunately, there are some restrictions that apply to faceless components.
Is there any (hacky) way to declare a nested faceless component in an
MXML document and assign a document scoped ID to it ??
6 matches
Mail list logo