The type depends on what the items in the ArrayCollection are. You can use
Object if you’re not sure. The cost of using Object is generally ignorable.
On 2/20/10 11:31 AM, "criptopus" wrote:
Something like ...
for each (var member in membData)
mEdit.membAccounts.push(member.usraccount
Something like ...
for each (var member in membData)
mEdit.membAccounts.push(member.usraccount);
not sure what to type member though?
- Stephen
e1984
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 6:20 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Array Collection
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, "thelordsince1984" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i've have an array collecti
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "thelordsince1984" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i've have an array collection of objects...every object is like this
one:
>
> - id:path
>
> private function create(id:String, path:String):void {
> var arrayCollection:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
> var o:Obj
use .getItemAt() instead of []
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "sanjaypmg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an ArrayCollection with various columns. I need to populate
> different combos using this array collection columns.
>
> I have a method where I am passing only column name
5 matches
Mail list logo