9:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Interesting problem with swf and swc sizes.
I am aware of this and it is part of the reason why I am trying to
create RSLs.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
, Sherif Abdou <[EMAIL PROTE
next time a
user loads the website it goes even faster or am i talking bout the
wrong thing.
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: rueter007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:47:36 PM
> Subject: [flexcoders] R
gt;
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:47:36 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Interesting problem with swf and swc sizes.
ran the optimizer on playerLib.swf. no reduction in size. :-(.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Gaurav Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
ran the optimizer on playerLib.swf. no reduction in size. :-(.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Gaurav Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It sounds like the playerLib.swf may not be optimized. Can you try
> running optimizer command on playerLib.swf?
>
> Thanks,
> Gaurav
>
It sounds like the playerLib.swf may not be optimized. Can you try
running optimizer command on playerLib.swf?
Thanks,
Gaurav
I am using FB3 Beta3 and I am comparing the release versions. I would
expect the file sizes to be different too but not something that would
increase by more than two fold when merged into code and 4-fold when
converted to an RSL swf.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jeffry Houser <[EMAIL PROTEC
6 matches
Mail list logo
