If this is covered under the SDK licence, then distributing the
framework gives Adobe the right to audit us. If that's the case, we
may have to stop using Flex altogether.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not not sure why you say the SDK license
When it's linked dynamically. There's an option to build the
framework into something like "framework_3.0.0.477.swf."
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Fore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm missing something but what kind of scenario would require
> redistributing the framewor
If you link your app dynamically, there's no way _not_ to distribute
the framework. And that's the best way to distribute an app when you
have multiple Flex apps on one site. By "distribute," I mean "store
on the web server along with the app."
But anyway, there's no obvious place where it even
Maybe I'm missing something but what kind of scenario would require
redistributing the framework?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:01 PM, whatabrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is covered under the SDK licence, then distributing the
> framework gives Adobe the right to audit us. If that's the
I mean, what are the business requirements that would lead someone to need
to distribute the framework?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:08 PM, whatabrain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When it's linked dynamically. There's an option to build the
> framework into something like "framework_3.0.0.477.swf."
5 matches
Mail list logo
