Re: [flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

Bjorn Schultheiss a écrit : > Sorry it was Flash Develop I had used.. Not FDT. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > , "Bjorn Schultheiss" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From what I've seen FDT looks like a nice tool. > > Although no IDE for Mac means

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

I think that the "no current requirement" detail would need further explanation and shouldn't be interpreted exactly as it is written. The use of Flex is almost never a requirement since you can generally accomplish the same result using other technologies, yet people still use Flex because of adva

[flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

Sorry it was Flash Develop I had used.. Not FDT. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Bjorn Schultheiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From what I've seen FDT looks like a nice tool. > Although no IDE for Mac means I haven't used it in anger. > > I think an interesting Flex 4 feature would be, to

[flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

>From what I've seen FDT looks like a nice tool. Although no IDE for Mac means I haven't used it in anger. I think an interesting Flex 4 feature would be, to be able to use Flex components within Flash (outside of a Flex project). --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Doug McCune" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

> > No current requirement for Flex components > > That seems like a relevant factor in the decision.. > I'd argue that the lack of a need for any Flex controls is an argument for not using the Flex framework, but not necessarily for not using Flex Builder as the development tool. Even if you a

[flexcoders] Re: Large application strategy - Flex or Flash?

> No current requirement for Flex components That seems like a relevant factor in the decision.. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Chabot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > None of the factors you mention seem highly relevant to making the decision. > > Are the developers already comfortabl