Hey, lay off your punches. I'm talking about the amount of time/code it
takes to implement, not the number of classes inside the library.
P.S. I'm not sure where you're getting 24 classes for Nimbus anyway. I'm
counting 12 (the four files in the utils directory aren't classes.) Get
back to me w
PS, PureMVC is only 21 classes because there are 11 interfaces, corresponding
to their implementations. There are only 11 actual classes in PureMVC. Get back
to me when you get your scales fixed :)
-=Cliff>
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Cliff Hall" wrote:
>
> Humorous that you say PureM
Humorous that you say PureMVC ( 21 classes )is "on the heavy side", instead
suggesting Nimbus ( 24 classes ) as an alternative.
-=Cliff>
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Aaron Hardy wrote:
>
> I'd consider those still being on the heavy side. One we use is called
> Nimbus and can be found h
You can download the source a build a new swc. By the way, I got your
email to my personal address. Unfortunately there currently aren't any
public project samples using Nimbus. They'll come as time and priority
permit. Good luck!
Aaron
Dnk wrote:
>
>
>
> Which swc to use then ? If one was
I would not assume that just because it exists that it is necessary.
Preference is everything and the term "overkill" exists for a reason.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, dnk wrote:
>
>
> On 18-Apr-09, at 10:07 PM, zuurl8 wrote:
>
> > Flex is a lightweight framework. Do you need more then
Which swc to use then ? If one was to try it out.
On 19-Apr-09, at 9:11 AM, Aaron Hardy wrote:
I'd consider those still being on the heavy side. One we use is called
Nimbus and can be found here:
http://code.google.com/p/nimbus-as3/
Don't use the available swc since it hasn't been update
I'd consider those still being on the heavy side. One we use is called
Nimbus and can be found here:
http://code.google.com/p/nimbus-as3/
Don't use the available swc since it hasn't been updated in a while.
Nimbus is similar to Cairngorm but lighter and cuts out a lot of the
plumbing. It al
Flex is a UI framework; I'd hardly consider it the answer to every one
of your programming needs. I suspect that the original poster was
looking for MVC alternatives.
PureMVC ( http://puremvc.org/ ) and Mate ( http://mate.asfusion.com/ )
seem to be the most popular alternatives in terms of
On 18-Apr-09, at 10:07 PM, zuurl8 wrote:
Flex is a lightweight framework. Do you need more then what Flex
provides in interface, events, and modules?
Well I think that I am talking about things more like code structure,
methods of doing things, etc. There are obviously benefits from these
Flex is a lightweight framework. Do you need more then what Flex provides in
interface, events, and modules?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Dnk wrote:
>
> Go there,
>
> I know there have been a billion topics regarding frameworks on here.
> I have been using cairngorm for a while and do
10 matches
Mail list logo