Spoil sports. :)
How does the debugger expose the properties and their values? Nothing
I can leverage there?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Gordon Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't believe you can get reflection info about protected or internal
> APIs either.
>
> Gordon Smith
> Behalf Of marty.pitt
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 1:14 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Reflection -- Accessing private fields
>
>
>
> Spoil sports. :)
>
> How does the debugger expose the properties and their values? Noth
uot; wrote:
> > >
> > > cc'ing Mike to get the lowdown on this. But I'm pretty sure that
> > > whatever the debugger is doing can't be done from ActionScript.
> > >
> > > - Gordon
> > >
> > > __________
What I've been trying to acheive is a port of the undo capabilities
used in CSLA (a .NET framework).
I must admit I hadn't looked at the momento pattern. Seems to be a
more suitable approach, given the reflection limitations.
Thanks Aaron.
Marty
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Aaron Mill
r 21, 2007 1:14 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Reflection -- Accessing private fields
Spoil sports. :)
How does the debugger expose the properties and their values? Nothing
I can leverage there?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.co
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> flexcoders@yahoogroups.com ] On
> > Behalf Of marty.pitt
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 1:14 PM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Reflection -- Accessing private fields
> >
> >
"Gordon
> > > Smith" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > cc'ing Mike to get the lowdown on this. But I'm pretty sure that
> > > > whatever the debugger is doing can't be done from ActionScript.
> > > >
> > &g
7 matches
Mail list logo
