7;ve definately
taken for
> granted all my other stuff has worked for that very fact. Oops.
>
> Actually, at this point, no clue... wtf were you talking about anyway,
> Bokel?
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "ben.clinkinbeard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
er stuff has worked for that very fact. Oops.
Actually, at this point, no clue... wtf were you talking about anyway,
Bokel?
- Original Message -
From: "ben.clinkinbeard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:50 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: cairngorm Events
te.
> I supposed you could make that assumption; not sure if it'd compile.
> Anyway, convention over strict-typing is ok since a lot of
conventions teams
> follow can do the above, for example, and assume you'll get what you
need.
>
>
> - Original Message -
&g
get what you need.
- Original Message -
From: "ben.clinkinbeard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:22 PM
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: cairngorm Events and data payloads
Forgive the dense noob here, but how is the type info lost? I thought
that by sub
{
> case MyEvent.EVENT_DOSOMETHING:
> someMethod ( MyEvent(event).someTypeSafeProp);
> break;
> }
> }
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ralf Bokelberg
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 27,
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: cairngorm Events and data
payloads
The only typesafe solution i can think of, is to abandon
CairngormEvents and replace them by methods of the FrontController. Most of the
apps i've seen s
July 27, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: cairngorm Events and data
payloads
Its really a pity, that we loose all the nice type information
while going all the way through Cairngorm. Cheers,Ralf.
On 7/27/06, Douglas
Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ah, righto. thanks
[flexcoders] Re: cairngorm Events and data
payloads
Its really a pity, that we loose all the nice type information
while going all the way through Cairngorm. Cheers,Ralf.
On 7/27/06, Douglas
Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ah, righto. thanks d00ds. I had this hacked up too mu
Its really a pity, that we loose all the nice type information while going all the way through Cairngorm.
Cheers,
Ralf. On 7/27/06, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ah, righto. thanks d00ds. I had this hacked up too
much...no worky good. If only I can get that damn RO to
calm do
ah, righto. thanks d00ds. I had this hacked up too much...no worky good. If only I can get that damn RO to calm down now and do what its told! but that's another thread.DK
On 7/27/06, thunderstumpgesatwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,The delegate function thinks you just have a CairngormE
Hi,
The delegate function thinks you just have a CairngormEvent. I think
you just need to check to make sure the event you received is your
custom event type and then cast it.
so:
if (eventHere is LoadScorecardEvent)
{
del.getScorecard( LoadScorecardEvent(eventHere).scorecardId );
}
else
{
11 matches
Mail list logo
