Shot in the dark, and untested, but what about using basic auth and
setCredentials on the webservice?
On 13 Apr 2007 13:24:57 -0700, scott_flex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tried it, instead of calling the .loadWsdl() method, i just set the
wsdl property so it at least know where the service
can try it, don't have time right this minute, but it's not something
i have thought of or tried, seems like a pretty good idea.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Clint Modien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot in the dark, and untested, but what about using basic auth and
setCredentials on the
On Thursday 12 Apr 2007, scott_flex wrote:
Not sure what other http network tools anyone uses, but i'll be
testing this with Fiddler, a MS http debugging tool.
Does it intercept SSL ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to continually harness professional models
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
Tom,
Well, http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2 says it supports SSL but it
also seems to get in the way and cause trust issues for IE when
capturing traffic... didn't work to well with FireFox either... It's
in a beta state, oh well. I'll look for another free http tool.
Anyway, i guess i'll
double check to make sure you actually have to load the wsdl. It's possible
that you can just call the functions and hope you're hitting a function that
exists. Unfortunately I don't have time to test this (possibly crackpot)
theory right now.
- Daniel Freiman
nondocs?
tried it, instead of calling the .loadWsdl() method, i just set the
wsdl property so it at least know where the service exists, also set
the endpoint to my asmx file, which is the web service.
Doesn't work.
--Scott
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel Freiman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
double
I'll have to confirm what you can and cannot see by watching traffic
when connected via SSL, i know the actual data is encrypted, which is
all in the soap body, so I would assume the actuall method call is
encrypted as well. I'll confirm...
You definately see all off the soap message if not
7 matches
Mail list logo
