Have you looked into using the metatags on the setter/getter? Making
the class itself bindable? I wrote a post about this a while back,
maybe you can get some info off of it:
http://jwopitz.wordpress.com/2007/03/29/a-common-binding-issue-and-a-work-around/
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "sc
Thanks, that did it, I initialized the value of userDisplayName via
my setter (which I didn't have before), instead of just through the
private _userDisplayName variable, bindings worked!
I still get this message though:
warning: unable to bind to property 'current' on class 'com::session'
(cl
do you have a setter on the property? I don't see one in the code you
posted. You need a setter for it to bind. Or at least you must fire a
PropertyChangeEvent when the property changes.
Paul
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "scott_flex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Actully, and i shoul
Actully, and i should have noted that in first post, i did try that,
but same warnings and same effect, no errors, but my property did not
bind to my label's text.
Would it or could it have anything to do with the fact it's a
singleton object??... I wouldn't think so.
Not shown in the example
Binding depends on the object being able to dispatch events to notify
the bind target that the property changed. To get around this you
simply extend EventDispatcher.
ie.
public class session extends EventDispatcher {
that will fix the warnings and bind your properties.
Paul
--- In flexcoders@
5 matches
Mail list logo
