At frist glacne the main issue is that you must use web servcies to get access to CFC data rather than establishing a direct connection w/ RemoteObject. Are there any other major ticking points (advantages/disadvantages) to not upgrading?
________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy Spratt Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:16 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: silly question about using "src" folder I was just playing with Ely's Calendar, which uses the src subfolder to hold source. Using Flex Builder, I was unable to make this work. I recall reading that runnable applications must be in the root of the FB project, and in fact, this was the only way I could get the Calendar to work. Is is possible to use a subfolder for source under Flex Builder? Tracy ________________________________ From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:36 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: silly question about using "src" folder Other than the main application, I put all my project code in com.mycompany.projects.ProjectName.somePackage, etc. I use the projects package so I can easily merge project-specific code into my overall code library if needed. Ben --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Paul DeCoursey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use src or source, I had many issues when I dumped sources in the > root. Mostly issues with recursive copies and subversion. I use > "source" for library and flex only projects. If the project is mixed > with server side logic then I use src/flex then all my source files > are in one location, but split out by language. > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Manuel Saint-Victor" > <diamondtearz@> wrote: > > > > Are mpost people using a separate "src" folder instead of just > dumping src > > code into the main project folder? > > >
