Re: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance question

2008-02-04 Thread Tom Sammons
rsday, January 31, 2008 10:18 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: > performance question > > Does anyone know who or a team I could forward this question to at Adobe > >

RE: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance question

2008-02-01 Thread Seth Hodgson
keep that in mind. Best, Seth From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Sammons Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 10:18 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance questio

Re: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance question

2008-02-01 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 31 Jan 2008, Tom Sammons wrote: > Does anyone know who or a team I could forward this question to at Adobe > that might be > able to answer this? I would have though rigging up your own test using Timer and a for loop would suffice. -- Tom Chiverton Helping to interactively extend

Re: [flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance question

2008-01-31 Thread Tom Sammons
Does anyone know who or a team I could forward this question to at Adobe that might be able to answer this? Tom Sammons wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I know I don't have to handle a remote object call results simply by not > defining the method's result event. > > Why would I want to do this? Beca

[flexcoders] RemoteObject call...No Result Handler: performance question

2008-01-29 Thread Tom Sammons
Hi everyone, I know I don't have to handle a remote object call results simply by not defining the method's result event. Why would I want to do this? Because I just want to record some action data in the database, and I don't need to do anything on completion of the call. My question is thi