Re: [flexcoders] any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

On Friday 30 June 2006 18:19, Kelly @ Dekayd Media Inc. wrote: Java may take a little longer but its free and massively scalable. OTOH, if the company is full of CF programs, is it worth the retraining time and expense ? -- Tom Chiverton

RE: [flexcoders] any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

and massively scalable. --Kelly From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Bray Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:27 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java

Re: [flexcoders] any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

Hey Tom,This subject was touched on a few weeks ago... I think the consensus was go with the one you're more familiar with... with that said, every large project I've worked on has used Java... so maybe ask yourself what the scope of the project is... also, do you have existing code in CF or

[flexcoders] any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

Since we have more CF developers in-house, we're wondering if there are any disadvantages or limitations of using CF with FDS instead of using Java. Scalability concerns? Features missing? We have existing chat/IM/presence apps that we're interested in porting over to FDS. Any thoughst are