Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread JesterXL
coupling.   - Original Message - From: Tony Pujals To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 2:29 PM Subject: RE: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 I just wanted to follow up in case my last post wasn’t totally clear. JesterXL said:   > > I usually do:> &g

RE: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Tony Pujals
com] On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:37 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5   helps to actually attach the file, eh?  sorry about the traffic...I need some of that coffee now too Jesse. DK On 11/23/05, Douglas Kn

RE: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Tony Pujals
: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:37 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5   helps to actually attach the file, eh?  sorry about the traffic...I need some of that coffee now too Jesse. DK On 11/23/05, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Johannes Nel
n 11/23/05, JesterXL < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > ...er, sorry, C.  2nd cup of coffee hasn't kicked in...> >> > - Original Message -> > From: "JesterXL" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > To: <flexcoders@yahoogroups.com>> > Sent: Wedn

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Douglas Knudsen
gt; ...er, sorry, C. 2nd cup of coffee hasn't kicked in... > > - Original Message - > From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:09 PM > Subject: Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 > > > I usually

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread JesterXL
...er, sorry, C. 2nd cup of coffee hasn't kicked in... - Original Message - From: "JesterXL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 I usually do: dispatchEvent({type: "someEven

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Johannes Nel
s Knudsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: < flexcoders@yahoogroups.com>> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:29 AM> Subject: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5>>> not supportted I know, how to work around?.  Say I have 3 components > A,B, and C.  B is a child of A

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread JesterXL
nudsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 drat! I read your blog entry on this too, forgot about it. Ok, in my scenario below, I have A catching the event dispatched in C. But the target in the e

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Douglas Knudsen
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:29 AM > Subject: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 > > > not supportted I know, how to work around?. Say I have 3 components > A,B, and C. B is a child of A and C is a child of B, each child among > children possibly. Now, if C fires

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Jeff Tapper
Take a look at the EventManager class I wrote, it allows you to specifically work with situations like this, to prevent having to redundantly handle rebroadcasting events. http://jeff.mxdj.com/using_the_event_manager.htm At 11:29 AM 11/23/2005, you wrote: >not supportted I know, how to work aro

Re: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread JesterXL
It IS supported: http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2005/11/event_bubbling.html - Original Message - From: "Douglas Knudsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:29 AM Subject: [flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5 not supportted I know, ho

[flexcoders] event bubbling Flex 1.5

2005-11-23 Thread Douglas Knudsen
not supportted I know, how to work around?. Say I have 3 components A,B, and C. B is a child of A and C is a child of B, each child among children possibly. Now, if C fires an event called fooEvent, I can get A to catch it, but the event.target points to B not C. The way I worked around this w