Ahh, so that's how it works. I didn't realize there was more to the
constructor then a normal event. That will teach me not to check the API
reference first. ;-)
Thank you both for the info!
~Aaron
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Daniel Gold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is used as the de
It is used as the default Binding event and you can create one using the
static method createUpdateEvent on the PropertyChangeEvent class
var changeEvent:PropertyChangeEvent =
PropertyChangeEvent.createUpdateEvent(changedObject,changedProperty,oldVal,newVal);
dispatchEvent(changeEvent);
That shou
Off the top of my head, when you instantiate a PropertyChangeEvent instead
of an Event, the constructor is expecting more useful information about what
field changed and when that information is missing / invalid the requisite
bindings don't fire. But when the binding handlers get a generic event o
Hello,
when I do this:
dispatchEvent( new PropertyChangeEvent(PropertyChangeEvent.PROPERTY_CHANGE)
);
My bindings do not execute.
When I do this:
dispatchEvent( new Event('propertyChange') );
They do (using default binding with no meta data specified).
What is what is the PropertyChangeEve
4 matches
Mail list logo
