Re: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? Can they be?

2008-05-13 Thread Josh McDonald
esday, May 13, 2008 9:08 PM > *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? > Can they be? > > > > Thanks for that. > > Yeah it's not something I'm planning on doing right now, I'm just sort of >

RE: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? Can they be?

2008-05-13 Thread Rick Winscot
A class must be marked as 'dynamic' in order to be. else it is 'sealed' at compile time. Creating a custom component based on Object isn't available. and being able to tweak bits here and bits there in an MXML component. I'd say you were asking for trouble. Besides Object != Sprite. so, no displayl

RE: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? Can they be?

2008-05-13 Thread Alex Harui
ck to working with stricter languages. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:08 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic

Re: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? Can they be?

2008-05-13 Thread Josh McDonald
Thanks for that. Yeah it's not something I'm planning on doing right now, I'm just sort of thinking out loud about a framework I really need to get off my ass and write in my spare time :) And I'm just growing ideas as to how I go about it. -J On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Alex Harui <[EMAIL

RE: [flexcoders] Classes defined in MXML - are they dynamic? Can they be?

2008-05-13 Thread Alex Harui
They are not dynamic by default. I'm not sure if there is a way to make them dynamic. IMHO, it is not a recommended practice, and there is usually some other way. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald Sent: Tues