RE: [flexcoders] Flex 2.0 beta 1 impressions

[David Mendels]

Hi,   Others can answer your main questions better than I can, but let me stress that you can still have a SWF compiled without need for a server that compiles MXML at runtime.  This has not changed.   -David From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonas Windey Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:22 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Flex 2.0 beta 1 impressions Hi, I just installed the new beta release and I’m having some problems.   I have the feeling that the Tree component isn’t working the way it worked before? (in the alpha version) When I give it an xml feed as dataprovider, it doesn’t create childnodes automatically. Any ideas?   Also the explorer folder in the samples folder doesn’t seem to work anymore (since there are no .swf’s anymore, I suppose they are all made to be run in an enterprise services 2 environment? Are we force to use this? I always liked the idea of an swf compiled without the need for a server who compiles the mxml files at runtime.   Thanks for any response,   Jonas Windey -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.