Karl:
Ok.
Thanks,
Jack
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl
JohnsonSent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:42 PMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] How do you advise
clients about "building for the future" - how long before Flex2
On Friday 02 June 2006 03:53, Jack W. Caldwell wrote:
Flash 9. Do you see such a resistance on the part of the consumer market
user
to not upgrade?
The problem will be if your app is used in corporate environments, where most
desktop users will not be able to upgrade Flash themeselves.
--
IMHO, only existing clients with large
applications will stay with 1.5/as2. The licence cost of 1.5 prevented
all but large enterprise clients from adopting Flex. 2.0 breaks that
barrier, and any shop can now build Flex apps of any size for the cost of
development. The third party market
I definitely agree with your points regarding licensing,
but the problem with adoption of flex 2.0 as the platform for consumer apps is
the need for the adoption of the new player. I personally would not want to
release a production flex 2.0 app to the world, on a public site, until the
Karl:
This seems to contradict what Adobe has said about the
"seamless" upgrading to
Flash 9. Do you see such a resistance on the part of
the consumer market user
to not upgrade?
If so, why? Will theupgrading not be as easy as
we think?
Thanks,
Jack
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
No, sorry if I implied that. I don't think the upgrade will
be hard in anyway. I am sure a lot of users will do it as soon as the player is
available.
Not a resistance on the user's part, my point is just that,
like any browser upgrade or web control/addin upgrade, the casual internet
6 matches
Mail list logo
