*Tracy Spratt
*Sent:* Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?
I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding
to e4x XML objects cause memory leaks:
http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://b
lf Of Scott -
FastLane
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 1:33 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?
Alex -
That is my posting, and I would hate for it to be "misinformation" in any way.
If your research turns up no evidence that
xcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?
I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to
e4x XML objects cause memory leaks:
http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14 <http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14>
His arguments / findings, seemed well reasoned and supported, a
oders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tracy
Spratt
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:47 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Memory leaks - binding to e4x XML?
I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to e4x XML
objects
I came across this article, wherein the author alleges that binding to e4x XML
objects cause memory leaks:
http://blog.fastlanesw.com/?p=14
His arguments / findings, seemed well reasoned and supported, and I do not
have the background to refute them. Perhaps someone here might discuss this
5 matches
Mail list logo