coders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
> Behalf Of Teddy Setiawan
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:39 AM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.c
Spot on..
Can't believed i never looked at that before.
Just check out the ListBase src and got an example of how to do it.
thanks.
On 01/02/2008, at 10:54 AM, Troy Gilbert wrote:
> I've got some scenarios where binding does not fire if I use
ac.addItem or
> ac.removeItem.
> But it will fi
> I've got some scenarios where binding does not fire if I use ac.addItem or
> ac.removeItem.
> But it will fire if i use ac = new ArrayCollection..
Sounds like you're binding to just the ArrayCollection instance
variable and not taking the second step and listening for the
collection events.
oders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Array vs ArrayCollection
I have the same problem regarding slower performance using
arraycollection in some iterating process.
Then I change it to array , but I get another big
problem..memory leak.
I use the array for small iter
s.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Array vs ArrayCollection
I have the same problem regarding slower performance using
arraycollection in some iterating process.
Then I change it to array , but I get another big problem..memory
leak.
I use the array for small iterating process and
I have the same problem regarding slower performance using arraycollection in
some iterating process.
Then I change it to array , but I get another big problem..memory leak.
I use the array for small iterating process and using arraycollection for larga
data.
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups
6 matches
Mail list logo
