You said you build the framework into an RSL, so I thought that meant you built a new RSL.
The way you set up the options in MXMLC dictate the location of the RSLs and the order it will look for them. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of whatabrain Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 3:00 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Help with runtime shared libraries It is signed by Adobe. This is the standard framework swz that FlexBuilder creates when you tell it to use an RSL. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>, Alex Harui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You won't be able to publish a SWZ only Adobe can do that. They have to be signed by Adobe. > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of whatabrain > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 2:32 PM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [flexcoders] Help with runtime shared libraries > > > I made the flex framework into an RSL, and I put both the swf and swz > versions in servername.com/subdir/. This is the same location where the > Flex app itself is located. Then I load the page, using the latest > version of Flash 9. I get the following error: > > Error #2032: Steam Error. URL: > http://servername.com/framework_3_0_0.477.swf > > Now I can obviously fix this by putting the swf in the root htdocs > directory, but I have two questions: > > 1) How can I get Flash to look in the app's subdirectory for the > framework files? I'm using FlexBuilder 3, if that helps. > > 2) Why is the browser requesting the swf instead of the swz? > > Thanks. >
